Conference Schedule
THe learning Educator:
Fostering our own development
for better practice and results
February 13–14, 2009
Sheraton Bloomington Hotel, Bloomington, MinnesotaRegister by the January 28 Early Bird deadline to save $50!
Click here to download a pdf version of the February, 2009, conference brochure
CONFERENCE SCHEDULE
Thursday, February 12
7:30–9:00 p.m.
Friday, February 13
Saturday, February 14
7:30 a.m. Registration Open 7:30–9:15 a.m. Faculty Developers' Breakfast Session 8:00–10:30 a.m. Preconference Workshops 7:30–9:45 a.m.
Continental Breakfast
9:45–10:30 a.m. Mini-Consultations 8:00–9:15 a.m. Concurrent Sessions II 10:45 a.m.–12:15 p.m. Opening Session 9:15–9:45 a.m. Break 12:30–1:30 p.m. Lunch 9:45–10:30 a.m. Mini-Consultations 1:45–3:00 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I 9:45–11:00 a.m.. Concurrent Sessions III 3:00–3:30 p.m. Break 11:15 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Closing Session 3:30–4:45 p.m. Plenary Session 5:00–6:00 p.m. Reception
FREE MINI-CONSULTATIONS ON CAMPUS INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE TEACHING, LEARNING, AND ASSESSMENT
Various times (see conference schedule). Registration required. Free.
Meet representatives of The Collaboration’s consulting corps and get tips on how to make your campus initiatives in teaching, learning, and assessment more successful. Sign up on the registration form to request a time slot, and be ready to describe your program’s needs and pose your questions. You can register on site, if space is available. First come, first served! Offered in conjunction with the Institute for Academic Innovation and Program Consulting and Evaluation Services.
CONCURRENT SESSIONS I
Friday, 1:45–3:00 PMA. An Ounce of Prevention: Protecting the Self from Burnout
B. Professional Learning Communities: A Collaborative Process for Faculty Development
C. A Conversation with Kathleen McKinney, Anthony Ciccone, and John Tagg
D. An In-Depth Study of Highly Successful Professional Programs
E. Another Tool in the Toolbox: Using Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL)
F. Reflecting on Critical Student Learning Experiences That Leverage Your Strengths
G. Promoting and Experiencing Collaborative Learning
H. Applying Science to Teaching Scientific Writing
CONCURRENT SESSIONS II
Saturday, 8:00–9:15 AMA. The Scottish Storyline Approach to Curriculum Design
B. Collaboration Across Disciplines Using the Lesson Study Method
C. SoTL and the Humanities: Studying How Students Move Toward More Complex Thinking in a
Course on Comedy and Laughter
D. Use of the Kreber/Cranton Model of the Scholarship of Teaching—Part I
E. Faculty Development: A Curricular Approach
F. Fostering Success in Developmental Learning Communities THIS SESSION HAS BEEN CANCELLED
G. A Case for High Context Science Instruction: Inviting Culture into Your Classes
CONCURRENT SESSIONS III
Saturday, 9:45–11:00 AM
A. So You Think You Can Teach. . . But What Do Students Say?
B. Faculty Development, Morningside Style
C. Student Perspectives on Learning a Discipline: Implications for Practice
D. Use of the Kreber/Cranton Model of the Scholarship of Teaching—Part II
E. To Blog or Not to Blog? Strategies for Assessing and Implementing
F. Jump-Start Your Learners' Brains: Multi-Sensory Whole-Brained Teaching
G. Inspiration and Intellect: Applying Fink's Theories of Integrated Course DesignH. Fostering Professional Development: Paths to Renewal at Mid-Career and Beyond
FACULTY DEVELOPERS' BREAKFAST SESSION
Saturday, 7:30–9:15 AM―Separate registration required.THE SINCERITY OF OUR INTENTIONS
Diane Pike, Professor of Sociology and Director for the Center for Teaching and Learning
Augsburg College
2008 Recipient of the Collaboration's Bellman Award for Exemplary Leadership for the Advancement of Teaching and LearningMany campuses find it an effort, if not a struggle, to engage a broad array of colleagues in faculty development. Programs often attract the same “usual suspects.” The people who might benefit most are often the least likely to participate. The notion that effective teaching can’t really be taught—let alone measured—persists. Who benefits from this situation? (Hint: not the students.) Starting from Stephen Brookfield’s idea that “One of the hardest things teachers have to learn is that the sincerity of their intentions does not guarantee the purity of their practice,” this participatory session will explore the strategies and limits of engaging a broader range of colleagues and of advocating for requisite, not optional, faculty development.
.
REGISTRATION INSTRUCTIONS
Please complete all sections of the form and return it with full payment. If using the online registration form, complete, print, sign, and mail or fax it with your payment. Remember to indicate preferences for concurrent sessions; this helps the conference staff with scheduling and helps presenters plan accordingly. Save $50 when you register by the Early Bird postmark deadline, January 28, 2009!
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION REFUND POLICY
Registration fees paid in advance are refundable (less a $50 cancellation fee) if written notice is received by February 4, 2009. Refunds cannot be made after that date unless the request is accompanied by written notification from a licensed medical professional. All refunds will be issued after the conference.
CONFERENCE CANCELLATION POLICY
It is very unlikely that the conference would be cancelled due to inclement weather. We are bound by hotel policies and are still billed for catering and room charges; therefore, we regret that we cannot reimburse registrants in the event of bad weather.HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS
Make your hotel reservations by contacting the Sheraton Bloomington Hotel, 7800 Normandale Boulevard, Bloomington, MN 55439, (866) 837-4278. To receive the discounted conference rate of $109 for Standard Rooms (South Tower), $139 for the Deluxe Rooms, or $149 for Club Concierge Rooms; make your reservations by January 21, 2009, and identify yourself as a conference participant. To guarantee your room for late arrival, the hotel requires payment for the first night or credit card confirmation. If you must cancel your reservation, do so prior to 6:00 p.m. on the scheduled day of arrival or you will forfeit the first night’s room and tax deposit. If you plan to depart earlier than your reserved check-out date, inform the hotel staff of your plans at or before check-in to avoid being charged a $50 early departure fee.VISIT THE CONFERENCE BOOKSTORE
Augsburg College will provide a bookstore, operated by Barnes & Noble, which will be open throughout the conference with an assortment of books related to the conference theme and topics in higher education. This is a great opportunity to stock up on resources to support improved teaching and learning. The bookstore accepts checks and major credit cards.
PLANNING COMMITTEE Virginia Allery
Turtle Mountain Community College
David Page
Inver Hills Community CollegeTim Barrett
The CollaborationGuynel Reid
Minnesota State University, MankatoZala Fashant
Minnesota State Colleges and University SystemThomas Staael
North Hennepin Community College
Alan Hanson
North Dakota State UniversityLeslie Werden
Morningside College
Lorilee LaPoint
University of South Dakota
CONCURRENT SESSION DESCRIPTIONS IA
AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION: Protecting the Self from Burnout
Amy Swanson, Director, Counseling ServicesConcordia University–St. Paul
Miranda Hellenbrand, Assistant Professor and Staff Psychologist, Counseling Center
Amy Wagener, Assistant Professor and Staff Psychologist, Counseling Center
Minnesota State University, Mankato
This workshop will assist faculty in taking proactive measures to ward off job-related depletion and burnout. Through didactic and experiential methods, participants will gain a conceptualization of burnout, engage in self-assessment on their own current levels of burnout, analyze various permutations of burnout in small and large group discussions, and identify preventive strategies to implement. Participants will receive handouts that include a self-assessment, a compilation of the signs and symptoms of burnout, and a reference list for further self-exploration on the topic.
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES: A Collaborative Process for Faculty Development
Lynda Van Driel, Associate Professor and Coordinator, Graduate and Middle Level Education
Robin Hasslen, Professor and Director, Early Childhood Services
Jay Rasmussen, Professor of Education and Director of Masters in K-12 Education
Craig Paulson, Professor and Director, Doctoral Program in Education Administration
Katie Raisanen, Associate Professor and Program Director, Masters in Special Education
Susan Brooks, Associate Professor and Chair, English Department
Bethel University
To better accomplish the goals of their vision and strategic plan in the education department at Bethel University, the faculty decided to participate in Professional Learning Communities (PLC) as vehicles for teams to reflect on current practice, study pertinent research in the field, develop new strategies, foster faculty professional development, and ultimately impact student learning. The purpose of this presentation is to share the process of the development of the professional learning communities and the results of a year-long participation of five PLC teams. Participants will learn about benefits and characteristics of Professional Learning Communities, understand the process for engaging staff in PLCs, learn about barriers to successful PLCs, share their experience with PLCs, and discuss possible action plans for designing PLCs at their institutions.
IC
A CONVERSATION WITH KATHLEEN MCKINNEY, ANTHONY CICCONE, AND JOHN TAGG
Join us for an informal conversation with our major speakers during this concurrent session. Bring your questions and comments to contribute to this discussion.
ID
AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMS
Guynel Reid, Professor, Department of Educational Studies: K-12 & Secondary Programs
Minnesota State University, Mankato
The features that account for successful programs in three different professions provide a unique perspective for improving student achievement and student satisfaction in professional education. The six identified features are: a student-centered constructivist learning environment, early and extensive field-based learning experiences, faculty and students functioning as mentor and mentees, technology seamlessly infused within the instruction, reference librarians working as critical partners with faculty and teaching their content within the program’s courses, and faculty remaining active in their non-teaching profession. Participants will explore how these features may be applicable to their professional education program.
IE
ANOTHER TOOL IN THE TOOLBOX: Using Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in the Classroom
Mary Hadley, Associate Professor
Jeffrey Pribyl, Professor
Patricia Rambo, Instructor
Department of Chemistry and Geology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
In order to move forward in our improvement of teaching, it is often instructive to look back at where we have been. Three faculty members who come to teaching and learning from diverse pathways will help participants craft a plan for change and transformation of their own teaching. Through the use of video clips from their own classrooms, the presenters will direct the participants through a guided inquiry activity to reflect on their own teaching style and create a plan for change in their own teaching.
IF
REFLECTING ON CRITICAL STUDENT LEARNING EXPERIENCES THAT LEVERAGE YOUR STRENGTHS
Velma Lashbrook, Assessment Consultant, Center for Leadership Studies
Augsburg College
This interactive session focuses on how to use critical incident analysis and strength-based strategies to continue to improve teaching. The critical incident method, long used in qualitative research and job analysis, is a useful tool for reflecting on the antecedents, behaviors, and consequences of a learning experience. Strength-based learning, based on extensive research in positive psychology, is an empowering approach for creating new experiences that build on one’s strengths. Participants will learn what the literature tells us about these methods, analyze a meaningful student learning experience, and design a learning experience that builds on one’s own strengths. Participants will find these tools useful for their own reflective practice and for designing reflective activities for students.
PROMOTING AND EXPERIENCING COLLABORATIVE LEARNING
Brian Dingmann, Assistant Professor, Math, Science, and Technology Department
Kevin D. Thompson, Assistant Professor, Communication, Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences Department
Marilyn Grave, Associate Professor, Early Childhood EducationUniversity of Minnesota–Crookston
As part of a classroom research project, seven faculty members from six disciplines met for two years. While the focus of the project was to research the incorporation of formal collaborative learning groups within their classrooms, a significant outcome was the building of relationships among faculty from different disciplines, learning from one another’s experiences, and exchanging ideas on a variety of teaching and learning issues, approaches, and philosophies. In this interactive session, participants will learn how collaborating with other faculty on classroom research projects can be a positive tool in their learning and development efforts (lessons learned, challenges, benefits, etc.) and discuss the results of the classroom research project on formal collaborative learning groups (approach, results, bibliography).
APPLYING SCIENCE TO TEACHING SCIENTIFIC WRITING
Yasmine L. Konheim-Kalkstein, Instructor, Department of Pschology
North Hennepin Community College
Mark A. Stellmack, Research Associate, Department of Psychology
University of Minnesota–Twin Cities
In a course in psychological research methods, the presenters encourage students to think critically and let empiricism guide their decisions. The presenters decided to apply the same standards to the development of their own instructional techniques in teaching scientific writing. For example, are rubrics valid and reliable measuring tools that permit objective grading of student writing? Does providing students with bad examples of writing improve their own writing? Does targeted instruction on peer review improve peer reviewing? Their research results will be used to spark discussion on improving student scientific writing. Lastly, the presenters will discuss the development of an undergraduate psychology research journal as a result of changed perspective. Participants will walk away with an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of rubric development (as well as a rubric to take home) and a clear understanding as to why and how to examine instructional techniques empirically.
THE SCOTTISH STORYLINE APPROACH TO CURRICULUM DESIGN
Wendy Emo, Instructor, Department of Teacher Education
Kenneth Emo, Assistant Professor, Department of Teacher Education
South Dakota State University
Jerome Bruner suggests that the story is the most typical form of storing experiences, and he refers to research demonstrating that whatever is stored in our memories from sources other than stories is easily forgotten. Storyline recognizes this and provides the structure of story for teachers to plan meaningful, memorable contexts for content learning. K-16 teachers in 22 countries find that students develop curricular ownership through the imaginative and visual context of Storyline, and as a consequence both motivation and knowledge retention increase. Students ask of themselves not, “What does the teacher want?” but “What does the situation demand of me?” Participants will experience Storyline as a student and will leave with an example and several curriculum planning ideas.
COLLABORATION ACROSS DISCIPLINES USING THE LESSON STUDY METHOD
Jennifer Christensen, Assistant Professor, Teacher Education, MSW Special Education Program
Monica Roth Day, Assistant Professor, Human Behavior and Diversity, Social Work Program
Shevaun Stocker, Assistant Professor, Human Behavior and Diversity, Social Work Program
University of Wisconsin - Superior
Lesson study is a method utilized to help educators examine and refine class content and activities. Developed in Japan, the method helps educators critically evaluate learning objectives and lesson plans. The presenters applied the method to understand an ethics lesson, taught in beginning courses in education, psychology and social work. The process provided the presenters with critical insights, which will be shared with participants. Participants will be provided with a definition of the lesson study method and ideas on how to apply the method in their classrooms. Opportunities for research and interdisciplinary collaboration will be identified. Participants will leave the interactive session, which will include video clips, with a clear plan for applying the lesson study method to their classes.
SoTL AND THE HUMANITIES: Studying How Students Move Toward More Complex Thinking in a Course on Comedy and Laughter
Anthony Ciccone, Professor of French and Director of the Center for Instructional and Professional Development,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Senior Scholar and Director,
The Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
For those in the humanities, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning provides unique opportunities and challenges. Many of the goals set for students—critical thinking, dealing with complexity and ambiguity—can be the source of essential questions about student learning and thus lead to interesting and fruitful investigations. Yet student progress toward these goals, and thus the effectiveness of instructional practices, are difficult to describe and measure. In this session, participants will examine how the inclusion of student reflective writing in a freshman seminar on comedy can encourage and provide evidence of student progress in dealing with complex topics. Participants will also draw some tentative conclusions about the unique perspective of the humanities on SoTL work.
USE OF THE KREBER/CRANTON MODEL OF THE SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING – Part I
Valerie Edwards Robeson, Assistant Professor of Social Sciences
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota
A dearth of recognized, systematic approaches impedes institutional progress toward the practice and evaluation of scholarship as advocated by Boyer. In this session, participants will explore and apply the Kreber and Cranton model of the scholarship of teaching. Individually, and in small and large group activities, participants will design inquiry plans for their own practice of the scholarship of teaching and consider those plans in light of institutional tenure and advancement practices. Read the description of Part II of this session here.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT: A Curricular Approach
Elizabeth Ciner, Associate Dean of the College
Nathan D. Grawe, Associate Professor, Department of Economics
Carol Rutz, Director, Writing Program
Carleton College
Faculty development is, at its best, curricular. That is, successful training for faculty resembles high quality undergraduate education: a curriculum composed of goal-oriented, iterative, active learning that is responsive to assessment. Although faculty development efforts vary from institution to institution, rarely are they conceived as a curriculum except in the sense that certain programs—e.g., a pre-service orientation or workshop—will be offered regularly. In this session, participants will examine and discuss assessment instruments, rubrics, and research designs that link faculty development to student learning.
FOSTERING SUCCESS IN DEVELOPMENTAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES
LuAnn Wood, Instructor, Reading Department
Cullen Bailey Burns, Instructor, English Department
Kathy Matel, Coordinator, Student Success Program
Century College
In 2003, Century College developed its first learning communities. Century now offers 14 developmental learning communities. One of these is a grouping of a developmental reading, developmental writing, and college-level academic success course. Developmental learning communities are just one of the first-year initiatives on campus. This session will focus on how developmental learning communities are increasing student retention, GPA, and satisfaction, and how being involved in learning communities challenges instructors to discuss and use best practices across disciplines.
NOTE: THIS SESSION HAS BEEN CANCELLED
A CASE FOR HIGH CONTEXT SCIENCE INSTRUCTION: Inviting Culture into Your Classes
Wren Walker Robbins, Secondary Education Science Director, Teacher Education Department
Kristie Dionne, Elementary Education Instructor, Teacher Education Department
Jennifer Wilson, Third-year Student, Secondary Education Department-Science
Turtle Mountain Community College
In this session, the presenters will explore a case study that helps expand the participants’ sense of education by illustrating how de-contextualized, abstract teaching practices can alienate Native American students. Participants will discuss the need to consider alternative culturally reflective methods of instruction that integrate students’ sense of culture and place while providing an authentic experience of science. Participants in this session will explore specific curricular resources that are intended to foster inclusion of culture and brainstorm ways they can apply these resources to their courses.
SO YOU THINK YOU CAN TEACH. . . BUT WHAT DO STUDENTS SAY?
Angela Bullock, Doctoral Student, School of Social Work
Narviar Calloway, Doctoral Program Chair, School of Social Work
Danielle Sweat, Doctoral Student, School of Social Work
Takeisha Wilson, Doctoral Student, School of Social Work
Clark Atlanta University
Teachers and college professors around the world enter the classroom eager to teach and create environments that are stimulating, challenging, and academically fulfilling. But do educators really teach and do the students learn what educators want them to learn? While educators and researchers agree that teacher classroom behaviors impact student learning, it remains unclear as to which teacher behaviors actually elevate student learning. Participants in this session will hear from students those behaviors that are critical to student learning, will view impromptu photographs of student behaviors towards teacher lectures, and will engage in self-reflective exercises to examine personal successes and failures as an educator.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT, MORNINGSIDE STYLE
Sharlene Georgesen, Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing Education
John Kolbo, Instructor, Department of Art
Pam Mickelson, Professor, Department of Business
Dean Stevens, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematical Sciences
Jessica de Vega, Assistant Professor, Department of Religious Studies
Morningside College
This is an opportunity to learn about and experience a successful faculty development program that is campus-based, reaches across disciplines, and has relatively low costs. The program has engaged faculty in the process of continuous improvement of teaching and learning by utilizing the strengths and expertise of their colleagues on campus. The program involves faculty-led discussions on a wide variety of topics that have included developing an international May Term, assessment plans, sabbatical projects and accomplishments, and developing or using grading rubrics. These efforts have contributed to a culture where faculty can learn from colleagues’ successes and expertise. Participants will not only learn about the program, including its successes and challenges, but will also be able to participate in a faculty development event done in the TGIF Morningside style.
STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON LEARNING A DISCIPLINE: Implications for Practice
Kathleen McKinney, Professor of Sociology and the Cross Chair in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Illinois State University
This interactive concurrent session will include a presentation of a series of small SoTL studies using multiple methods on student learning in one discipline, sociology. The foci of the work were student understandings of how they best learn the discipline as well as factors associated with success in the major. The presentation will provide a concrete example of local SoTL work in one discipline that addressed teaching-learning problems or questions common to all disciplines. In addition, some of the problems and solutions SoTL researchers face will be discussed. Implications for teaching and learning in sociology and other disciplines will be shared by participants.
USE OF THE KREBER/CRANTON MODEL OF THE SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING – Part II
Valerie Edwards Robeson, Assistant Professor of Social Sciences
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota
The second part of this two-part workshop will further explore and apply the Kreber and Cranton model of the scholarship of teaching. Read the full description of the session here.
TO BLOG OR NOT TO BLOG? STRATEGIES FOR ASSESSING AND IMPLEMENTING
Pauline Stonehouse, Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Leadership
Cynthia Shabb, Director, Department of Teaching and Learning
Kathy Smart, Assistant Professor, Department of Teaching and Learning
Bonni Gourneau, Assistant Professor, Department of Teaching and Learning
University of North Dakota–Grand Forks
If you have ever considered using blogs or creating podcasts in your classes, this is the session to attend. Four college faculty members collaborated on this action research project, and they believe that the experience improved the students’ learning and their instruction. Presenters will share their perspectives based on their content areas, which include higher education, technology, administration, and K-8 social studies. Presenters will share results from a qualitative study and involve participants in exercises designed to clarify the potential of blogging in an academic setting and to have participants consider learning through blogging and the formal assessment of blog activities.
JUMP-START YOUR LEARNERS’ BRAINS: Multi-Sensory Whole-B rained Teaching
Laurie Materna, Instructor, Department of Nursing
Milwaukee Area Technical College
Jump-start your learners’ brains. “Multi-sensory Whole-brained Teaching” is an exciting and highly interactive, hands-on session designed to assist educators in promoting brain-compatible learning. Throughout the session, participants will discover their own unique learning profile in terms of style, brain dominance, and learning intelligence. In addition, participants will learn how to use breathing and movement exercises in class, how to prime the brain with music, and how to appeal to the brain’s natural affinity to process information visually. Participants will be provided with sample learning style, brain dominance, and multiple intelligence surveys, as well as a variety of brain warm-up activities and graphic organizer templates that can be used in the classroom. No matter what your current teaching style, there is something to make everyone feel comfortable in this dynamic presentation!
INSPIRATION AND INTELLECT: Applying Fink’s Theories of Integrated Course Design
Bruce Earnest, Associate Professor, Department of Theatre and Director of Musical Theatre
Bruce Kelley, Associate Professor, Department of Music and Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning
University of South Dakota
Creating Significant Learning Experiences (Fink, 2003) has become an influential force in helping faculty to develop powerful learning experiences in their courses and throughout their curricula. In this workshop, participants will take an active and lively role in applying the intermediate stage of Fink’s model for course design. Through the presenters’ own examples from music and theatre, and through examples generated by the participants, participants will explore how Fink’s taxonomy provides a vehicle by which they can design their classes to give students significant learning experiences—in the presenters’ case, a soaking in the sonorous nature of our art—and a way to make inspiration and intellect not just compatible, but positively harmonious.
FOSTERING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Paths to Renewal at Mid-
Career and Beyond
Anne Kelsch, Director, Instructional Development
Joan Hawthorne, Assistant Provost, Academic Affairs
University of North Dakota—Grand Forks
Renewal is essential in all professions. And avoiding burnout is especially important in academia where faculty may find that every semester starts to feel the same, yet each student is entitled to the best we have to give. Participants will gain a heightened awareness of the importance of attention to professional development—one’s own and that of colleagues and peers. Participants will also talk about strategies for building enthusiasm and staying fresh and fully engaged in their work. Presenters will share ten strategies for fostering professional growth that can be easily adapted across different kinds of campuses and situations. The session will conclude with discussion of institutional conditions that can enhance faculty engagement.